Programa de coaching para tutores clínicos en enfermería: un estudio intervención

Coaching program to improve nurses' perceptions of preceptorship of undergraduate students: an intervention study

  • Elena Regaira Martínez Clínica Universidad de Navarra. España
  • Mónica Vázquez Calatayud Clínica Universidad de Navarra. España. Universidad de Navarra, Innovation for a Person-Centred Care Research Group (ICCP-UNAV). Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA). España
Palabras clave: Intervención educativa, Evaluación, Preceptores, Revisión sistemática, Docencia clínica de pregrado
Key-words: Educational intervention, Evaluation, Preceptors, Systematic review, Undergraduate clinical teaching

Resumen

Abstract

Bibliografía


  1. Pedregosa S, Fabrellas N, Risco E, Pereira M, Dmoch-Gajzlerska E, Şenuzun F, Martin S, Zabalegui A. Effective academic-practice partnership models in nursing students' clinical placement: A systematic literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;95:104582. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104582

  2. Sanjuán Quiles A, Martínez Riera JR. Tutorización clínica en enfermería. Rev ROL Enferm. 2018;41(7-8):522-527.

  3. Blevins S. Qualities of Effective Preceptors. Medsurg Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;25(1):60-1.

  4. Ward A, McComb S. Precepting: A literature review. J Prof Nurs. 2017;33(5):314–325. doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.07.007

  5. Tuomikoski AM, Ruotsalainen H, Mikkonen K, Miettunen J, Juvonen S, Sivonen P, Kääriäinen M. How mentoring education affects nurse mentors' competence in mentoring students during clinical practice - A quasi-experimental study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020;34(1):230-238. doi.org/10.1111/scs.12728

  6. Pramila-Savukoski S, Juntunen J, Tuomikoski AM, et al. Mentors' self-assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: A systematic review of quantitative studies. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(5-6):684-705. doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15127

  7. Mikkonen K, Ojala T, Sjögren T, et al. Competence areas of health science teachers - A systematic review of quantitative studies. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;70:77-86. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.017

  8. Kolomo E, Vernon R, Toffoli L. A critical review of preceptor development for nurses working with undergraduate nursing students. Int J Caring Sci. 2017;10(2):1089.

  9. Perpiñá Galvañ J, Peña Rodríguez A, Cabañero Martínez MJ, et al. Evaluación de la satisfacción de los tutores clínicos del Practicum del Grado Enfermería de la Universidad de Alicante. En: Roig Vila R (coordinadora). Memorias del Programa de Redes-I3CE de calidad, innovación e investigación en docencia universitaria. Convocatoria 2016-17. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación (ICE); 2017.

  10. Girotto LC, Enns SC, de Oliveira MS, et al. Preceptors' perception of their role as educators and professionals in a health system. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):203. doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1642-7

  11. Regaira-Martínez E, Ferraz-Torres M, Mateo-Cervera AM, Vázquez-Calatayud M. Nurses' perceptions of preceptorship of undergraduate students in clinical context. J Prof Nurs. 2023;48:15-21. doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.05.008

  12. Tracey JM, McGowan IW. Preceptors' views on their role in supporting newly qualified nurses. Br J Nurs. 2015 Nov 12-25;24(20):998-1001. doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.20.998

  13. Myrick F, Yonge O, Billay D. Preceptorship and practical wisdom: A process of engaging in authentic nursing practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010;10(2):82-87. doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.03.018

  14. Cusack L, Thornton K, Drioli-Phillips PG, et al. Are nurses recognised, prepared and supported to teach nursing students: Mixed methods study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;90:104434. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104434

  15. Mikkonen K, Tomietto M, Cicolini G, et al. Development and testing of an evidence-based model of mentoring nursing students in clinical practice. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;85:104272. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104272

  16. Cervera-Gasch A, Macia-Soler L, Torres-Manrique B, et al. Questionnaire to Measure the Participation of Nursing Professionals in Mentoring Students. Investig Educ Enferm. 2017;35(2):182-190. doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v35n2a07

  17. Chan HY, So WK, Aboo G, et al. Understanding the needs of nurse preceptors in acute hospital care setting: A mixed-method study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jul;38:112-119. doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.06.013

  18. Nordquist J, Hall J, Caverzagie K, et al. The clinical learning environment. Med Teach. 2019;41(4):366-372. doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1566601

  19. Cervera-Gasch Á, Gonzalez-Chorda VM, Mena-Tudela D, et al. Participación de las enfermeras clínicas en la formación práctica de estudiantes de Grado en Enfermería. Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2018;28(3):171-178. doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.11.003

  20. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061

  21. Procter A, Allan B. Manual de investigación en ciencias sociales. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide; 2012.

  22. Viechtbauer W, Smits L, Kotz D, et al. A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11):1375-1379. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014

  23. Delaney MC. Caring for the caregivers: Evaluation of the effect of an eight-week pilot mindful self-compassion (MSC) training program on nurses' compassion fatigue and resilience. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207261. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207261

  24. Griffiths M, Creedy D, Carter A, et al. Systematic review of interventions to enhance preceptors' role in undergraduate health student clinical learning. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;62:103349. doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103349

  25. Ryan C, Young L, McAllister M. The impact of an online learning platform about nursing education on enrolled nurse preceptor teaching capabilities: a pre-post-test evaluation. Contemp Nurse. 2017;53(3):335-347. doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1347512

  26. Peters M. Does constructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education? J Nurs Educ. 2000;39(4):166-172. doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-07

  27. Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, et al. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:64. doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064

  28. World Health Organization. Transforming and scaling up health professionals' education and training: World Health Organization guidelines 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

  29. Bengtsson M, Carlson E. Knowledge and skills needed to improve as preceptor: development of a continuous professional development course - a qualitative study part I. BMC Nurs. 2015;14:51. doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0103-9

  30. Browning M, Pront L. Supporting nursing student supervision: An assessment of an innovative approach to supervisor support. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(6):740-745.

  31. Broadbent M, Moxham L, Sander T, Walker S, Dwyer T. Supporting bachelor of nursing students within the clinical environment: perspectives of preceptors. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(4):403-409. doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.12.003

  32. Rebaza Iparraguirre JN, Infantas Cáceres CA. Coaching en la gestión del talento humano del personal docente universitario. Rev Científica Searching Cienc Hum Soc. 2023;4(1):67–80. doi.org/10.46363/searching.v4i1.5

  33. Ong SLE, Ang WHD, Goh LJ, Lau Y. Understanding nurse preceptors’ experiences in a primary health care setting: A descriptive qualitative study. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29:1320–1328. doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13272

  34. Polit DF, Yang F. Measurement and the measurement of change: A primer for the health professions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2016.

  35. Miller CJ, Smith SN, Pugatch M. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112452. doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112452

Novedades
Estadísticas
Cómo citar
1.
Regaira Martínez, Elena; Vázquez Calatayud, Mónica. Programa de coaching para tutores clínicos en enfermería: un estudio intervención. Tesela, Liderazgo y Gestión. 2025; 33: e15644. https://doi.org/10.58807/revtesela20257528 https://ciberindex.com/c/ts/e15644
Sección
Originales
Comentarios

DEJA TU COMENTARIO     VER 0 COMENTARIOS

Normas y uso de comentarios


Hay un total de 0 comentarios


INTRODUCIR NUEVO COMENTARIO

Para enviar un comentario, rellene los campos situados debajo. Recuerde que es obligatorio indicar un nombre y un email para enviar su comentario (el email no sera visible en el comentario).

Nombre:
e-mail:
Comentario: