Influencia de las condiciones de trabajo, profesionalismo y capital psicológico en la percepción de la calidad del cuidado de profesionales de enfermería chilenos
Influence of working conditions, professionalism and psychological capital on the perception of the quality of care of chilean nursing professionals
Resumen
Abstract
Bibliografía
1. Borré Y, Lenis C, González G. Utilidad del cuestionario SERVQHOS-E para medir calidad percibida de la atención de enfer-mería. Revista CES Salud Pública. 2014; 5(2). Disponible en: http://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/ces_salud_publica/article/view/3016
2. Silva A, Reis A, Miasso A, Santos J, Cassiani S. Eventos adversos a medicamentos em um hospital sentinela do Estado de Goiás, Brasil. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2011; 19(2): 378-86. Recuperado de: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v19n2/pt_21.pdf
3. Luengo C, Paravic T, Burgos M, López MA. Adaptación transcultural del instrumento Karen Personal para medir la percepción de la calidad del cuidado en enfermeras de hospital. Enf. Clinica. 2019; 29(3): 146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.10.007
4. Andersson I, Lindgren M. The Karen Instruments for Measuring Quality of Nursing Care. Item Analysis. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research. 2008; 28: 14-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/010740830802800304
5. Liu Y, Aungsuroch Y. Factors influencing nurse-assessed quality nursing care: A cross-sectional study in hospitals. J Adv Nurs. 2018; 74: 935–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13507
6. Aiken L, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Lake ET, Cheney T. Effects of Hospital Care Environment on Patient Mortality and Nurse Outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2008; 38(5): 223-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA.0000312773.42352.d7
7. Aiken L, Sloane D, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Sermeus W. Nurses reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2013; 50: 143–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009.
8. Raspe M, Koch P, Zilezinski M, Schulte K, Bitzinger D, Gaiser U, et al. Working conditions and health status of young physi-cians and nurses in German hospitals. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2020; 63: 113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-019-03057-y
9. Luengo C, Paravic T, Burgos, M Calidad del cuidado del profesional de Enfermería y condiciones ambientales y psicosociales de trabajo. Revista Enfermería del Trabajo. . 2016; 6(4): 117-25. Disponible en: http://enfermeriadeltrabajo.com/ojs/index.php/et/article/view/103
10. Purdy N, Laschinger H, Finegan J, Kerr M, Olivera F. Effects ok work environments on nurse and patient outcomes. J Nur Manag. 2010; 18: 901-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01172.x.
11. Patiño J. Profesionalismo en Enfermería. Revista de actualizaciones en enfermería. 2014; 14(1). Recuperado de: https://encolombia.com/medicina/revistas-medicas/enfermeria/ve-141/profesionalismoenenfermeria/
12. Wynd C. Current Factors Contributing to Professionalism in Nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2003; 19(5): 251-61. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(03)00104-2
13. Hwang J. Lou F, Han S, Cao F, Kim W, Li P. Professionalism: The Major Factor Influencing Job Satisfaction among Korean and Chinese nurses. International Nursing Review. 2009; 56(3): 313-8. doi; 10.1111 / j.1466-7657.2009.00710.x
14. Luthans F, Avey J, Avolio B, Norman S, Combs G. Psychological Capital Development: Toward a Micro‐intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2006; 27: 387‐93. Recuperado de: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1010&context=leadershipfacpub
15. Luthans F, Avey J, Avolio B, Norman S. Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology. 2007; 60: 541‐72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x.
16. Andersson I, Lindgren M. The Karen Instruments for Measuring Quality of Nursing Care: Construct Validity And Internal Consistency. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. . 2011; 23(3): 292–301. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq092
17. Blanch JM, Sahagún M, Cervantes G. Estructura factorial de la Escala de Condiciones de Trabajo. Journal of Work and Or-ganizational Psychology. 2010; 26(3): 175-89. Recuperado de: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1576-59622010000300002
18. Hall R. H. Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review. 1968; 33(1): 92-104.
Luthans F, Youssef C, Avolio B. Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. New York:Oxford University Press. 2007. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001
19. Emanuel E, Wendler D, Grady C. What make clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000; 283(20): 2701-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701
20. Lapeña Y, Cibanal L, Pedraz A, Macía M. As Relações Interpessoais Dos Enfermeiros Na Assistência Hospitalar E O Uso Das Capacidades Comunicativas. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2014; 23(3): 555-62. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=71432144003
21. Garlet E, Dias da Silva M, Guedes J, Quintana G. Organização do trabalho de uma equipe de saúde no atendimento ao u-suário em situações de urgência e emergencia. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2009; 18(2): 266-72. Recuperado de: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v18n2/09.pdf
22. Fernandez A, Cuairán M, Curbelo R. Calidad de vida profesional de enfermería en urgencias de un hospital de referencia. Enferm. Glob. 2016; 15(2): 376-85. Recuperado de: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1695-61412016000200013&lng=es.
23. Luengo C, Paravic T. Autonomía Profesional: Factor clave para el ejercicio de la enfermería basada en la evidencia. Index Enferm. 2016; 25(1-2): 42-6. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962016000100010&lng=es
24. Karadag˘A, Hisar F, O¨zhan Elbas N. The Level of Professionalism Among Nurses in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2007; 39:4: 371–74. Obtenido de: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1695-61412016000200013&lng=es.
25. Luthans F, Luthans K, Luthans B. Positive Psychological Capital: Beyond the Human and Social. Business Horizons. 2004; 47(1): 45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2003.11.007
26. Jacondino M, Martins C, Thofehrn M, Garcia B, Fernandes H, Joner L. Vínculos profesionales en el trabajo de enfermería: elemento importante para el cuidado. Enferm. Glob. . 2014; 13(34): 148-59. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1695-61412014000200007&lng=es.
27. Avey J, Luthans F, Jensen S. Psychological Capital: A Positiv Resource Forcombating Employees Stress and Turnover. Huma Resource Management. 2009; 48(5): 667-93. Recuperado de: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hrm.20294
28. Luthans K, Jensen S. The Linkage Between Psychological Capital and Commitment to Organizational Mission: A Study of Nurses. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2005; 35(6): 304–10. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299058673_The_linkage_between_psychological_capital_and_commitment_to_organizational_mission_-_A_study_of_nurses
29. Sun T, Zhao W, Yang B, Fan H. The impact of psychological capital on job embeddedness and job performance among nurses: a structural equation approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2012; 68(1): 69–79. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51195260_The_impact_of_psychological_capital_on_job_embeddedness_and_job_performance_among_nurses_A_structural_equation_approach
- Resumen visto - 1155 veces
- PDF descargado - 35 veces