Parâmetros utilizados na avaliação de bem-estar do bebê no nascimento
Parameters used in the evaluation of the baby’s welfare at birth
Parámetros utilizados en la evaluación del bienestar del bebé al nacer
Resumen
Abstract
Resumo
Bibliografía
(1) Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco/Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde; 2012 [acesso: 6 nov. 2017]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/cadernos_atencao_basica_32_prenatal.pdf
(2) Opas (Organização Pan-Americana de Saúde). Neonatal IMCI Evidence-based Interventions. Washington: PAHO; 2011.
(3) Tamez RN, Silva MJP. Enfermagem na UTI neonatal: assistência ao recém-nascido de alto risco. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2006.
(4) Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria GM/MS n.º 371, de 7 de maio de 2014: institui para organização da atenção integral e humanizada ao recém-nascido (RN) no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2014 [acesso: 6 nov. 2017]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/sas/2014/prt0371_07_05_2014.html
(5) Brasil, Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas e Estratégicas. Atenção à Saúde do Recém-Nascido: guia para profissionais de saúde. Volume 1. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011 [acesso: 6 nov. 2017]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/atencao_saude_recem_nascido_v1.pdf
(6) Apgar V. A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant. Anesthesia & Analgesia [serial on the Internet]. 2015 [access: 2017 Nov 6]; 120(5):1056-9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13083014
(7) Santos LM, Pasquini VZ. A importância do Índice de Apagar. Revista de Enfermagem Unisa [periódico na internet]. 2009 [acesso: 6 nov. 2017]; 10(1):39-43. Disponível em: http://www.unisa.br/graduacao/biologicas/enfer/revista/a rquivos/2009-1-08.pdf
(8) Ige OO, Ruth A, John C, Stephen A, Toma B. Knowledge and application of APGAR score among residents in a tertiary hospital. Sahel Medical Journal [serial on the Internet]. 2015 [access: 2017 Oct 30];18(1):9-13. Available from: http://www.smjonline.org/text.asp?2015/18/1/9/152152
(9) Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Revisão Integrativa: o que é e como fazer? Einstein [periódico na internet]. 2010 [acesso: 31 out. 2017];8(1):1026. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/eins/v8n1/pt_1679-4508-eins-8-1-0102.pdf
(10) Brasil, Ministério da Justiça. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução n.º 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012: aprova diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2012 [acesso: 31 out. 2017]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html
(11) Snowden JM, Kozhimannil KB, Muoto B, Caughey AB, McConnell JK. A’busy day’effect on perinatal complications of delivery on weekends: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Qual Saf [serial on the Internet]. 2017 [access: 2017 Nov 05];26:e1:1-9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27472947
(12) Safa H, Beckmann M. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes from full-dilatation cesarean deliveries using the Fetal Pillow or hand-push method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 5];135(3):281-4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27599604
(13) Herstad L, Klungsoyr K, Skjærven R, Tanbo T, Forsén L, Åbyholm T et al. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 02];16(230):1-11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4988032/
(14) Lim KM, Tong PS, Chong YS. A comparative study between the pioneer cohort of waterbirths and conventional vaginal deliveries in an obstetrician-led unit in Singapore. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 2];55(3):363-7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27343316
(15) McDonald DAM, Liu E, Tran V, Cabrera A, Aboud S et al. Angiogenic proteins, placental weight and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women in Tanzania. PLoS One [serial on the Internet]. 2016[access: 2017 Nov 4];11(12):e0167716. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0167716
(16) Sabol BA, Caughey AB. Acidemia in neonates with a 5-minute Apgar score of 7 or greater — What are the outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 4];215(4):486e1-e6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255470
(17) Wernham E, Gurney J, Stanley J, Ellison-Loschmann L, Sarfati D. A Comparison of Midwife-Led and Medical-Led Models of Care and Their Relationship to Adverse Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study in New Zealand. PLoS Medicine [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 4];13(9):e1002134. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002134&type=printable
(18) Rowe R, Li Y, Knight M, Brocklehurst P, Hollowell J. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) at home in England: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 6];123(7):1123-32. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213223
(19) Denison FC, Norwood P, Bhattacharya S, Duffy A, Mahmood T, Morris C et al. Association between maternal body mass index during pregnancy, short-term morbidity, and increased health service costs: a population-based study. BJOG [serial on the Internet]. 2014 [access: 2017 Nov 6];121(7):72-82. Available
from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24102880
(20) Lee HC, Power RJ, Bennett MV, Finer NN, Halamek LP, Nisbet C et al. Implementation Methods for Delivery Room Management: A Quality Improvement Comparison Study. Pediatrics [serial on the Internet]. 2014 [access: 2017 Nov 6];134(5):e1378-86. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332503
(21) O’Dea A, Infanti JJ, Gillespie P, Tummon O, Fanous S, Glynn LG et al. Screening uptake rates and the clinical and cost effectiveness of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in primary versus secondary care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials [serial on the Internet]. 2014 [access: 2017 Nov 6];15(27):1-9. Available from: https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1745-6215-15-27?site=trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com
(22) Yangmei L, Townend J, Rowe R, Knight M, Brocklehurst P, Hollowell J. The effect of maternal age and planned place of birth on intrapartum outcomes in healthy women with straightforward pregnancies: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BMJ [serial on the Internet]. 2014[access: 2017 Nov 6];4(1):1-15. Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/4/1/e004026.full.pdf
(23) Hokkanen L, Launes J, Michelsson K. The Perinatal Adverse events and Special Trends in Cognitive Trajectory (PLASTICITY) — pre-protocol for a prospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study. F1000Research [serial on the Internet]. 2013[access: 2017 Nov 6];2(50):1-16. Available from: https://f1000researchdata.s3.amazonaws.com/manuscripts/950/a2262d1e-0893-415c-afae-54acee202584_16%20-%20hokkanen%2 02-50.pdf?doi=10.12688/f1000research.2-50.v1
(24) Kozhimannil KB, Sommerness SA, Rauk P, Gas R, Hirt C, Davis S et al. A Perinatal Care Quality and Safety Initiative: Hospital Costs and Potential Savings. J Qual Patient Saf [serial on the Internet]. 2013[access: 2017 Nov 2];39(8):339-48. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3761411/
(25) Hernández B, Ortiz-Panozo E, Pérez-Cuevas R et al. Facility-based care for delivery and management of complications related to pregnancy and childbirth in Mexico. Salud Pública de México [serial on the Internet]. 2012 [access: 2017 Nov 2];54(5):496-505. Available from: http://www.scielosp.org/pdf/spm/v54n5/a05v54n5.pdf
(26) Urquiza MF, Blanco VG. La colaboración cubana en Argelia en el área materno-infantil durante los años 2007-2010. Revista Electrónica de las Ciencias Médicas en Cienfuegos [revista en Internet]. 2012 [acceso: 2 nov. 2017];10(5):340-5. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ms/v10n5/ms02510.pdf
(27) Koettker JG, Brüggemann OM, Dufloth RM. Partos domiciliares planejados assistidos por enfermeiras obstétricas: transferências maternas e neonatais. Rev Esc Enferm USP [periódico na internet]. 2013 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017];47(1):15-21. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v47n1/a02v47n1.pdf
(28) Khambalia AZ, Algert CS, Bowen JR, Collie RJ, Roberts CL. Long-term outcomes for large for gestational age infants born at term. J Paediatr Child Health [serial on the Internet]. 2017 [access: 2017 Nov 7];53(9):876-81. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868781
(29) You JY, Choi SJ, Roh CR Kim JH Oh SY. Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes Treated with Regular Insulin or Fast-Acting Insulin Analogues. Gynecol Obstet Invest J Paediatr Child Health [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 7];81(3):232-7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26474335
(30) Wei Q, Sun Z, Yang Y, Yu H, Ding H, Wang S. Effect of a CGMS and SMBG on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Sci Rep [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 7];27(6):19920. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728693/pdf/srep19920.pdf
(31) Ni Y, Cheng W. Clinical characteristics of early-onset pre-eclampsia in singleton versus multiple pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 7];132(3):325-8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26674315
(32) De Paiva Marques RM, Souza AS, de Lucena Feitosa FE, da Costa AA, Amorim MM. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with and without hypertensive syndromes submitted to induction of labor with misoprostol. Hypertens Pregnancy [serial on the Internet]. 2017[access: 2017 Nov 7];36(1):1-7. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10641955.2016.1197935
(33) Moura MD, Margotto PR, Rugolo LM. Alterações do fluxo sanguíneo em artéria umbilical na síndrome hipertensiva gestacional e suas implicações nos resultados neonatais. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet [periódico na internet]. 2013[acesso: 7 nov. 2017];35(2):71-7. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbgo/v35n2/06.pdf
(34) Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas e Estratégicas. Além da sobrevivência: práticas integradas de atenção ao parto, benéficas para a nutrição e a saúde de mães e crianças/Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Área Técnica de Saúde da Criança e Aleitamento Materno. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017]. Disponível em: http://www.sbp.com.br/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Alem_sobrevivencia_Praticas_integradas_atencao_parto.pdf
(35) Bharti B, Bharti S. A review of the Apgar score indicated that contextualization was required within the contemporary perinatal and neonatal care framework in different settings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [serial on the Internet]. 2005 [access: 2017 Nov 7];58(2):121-9. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S 0895435604001817
(36) Josten BE, Johnson TR, Nelson JP. Umbilical cord blood pH and Apgar scores as an index of neonatal health. Am J Obstet Gynecol [serial on the Internet]. 1987 [access: 2017 Nov 7];157(4 Pt1):843-8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 3674157
(37) Schimidt B, Kirpalani H, Rosenbaun P, Cadman D. Strenghts and Limitations of the Apgar Score: A Critical Appraisal. J Clin Epidemiol [serial on the Internet]. 1988 [access: 2017 Nov 7];41(9):843-50. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3183690
(38) Manganaro R, Mami C, Gemelli M. The validity of the Apgar scores in the assessment of asphyxia at birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [serial on the Internet]. 1994 [access: 2017 Nov 7];54(2):99-102. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8070606
(39) O’Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Carlin JB, Morley CJ. Interobserver Variability of the 5-Minute Apgar Score. The Journal of Pediatrics [serial on the Internet]. 2006 [access: 2017 Nov 7];194(4):486-9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17011319
(40) Marlow N. Do we need an Apgar Score? Arch Dis Child [serial on the Internet]. 1992 [access: 2017 Nov 7];67(7 Spec No):765-7. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590414/pdf/archdisch00888-0007.pdf
(41) Li F, Wu T, Lei X, Zhang H, Mao M, Zhang J. The Apgar Score and Infant Mortality. PLoS One [serial on the Internet]. 2013[access: 2017 Nov 7];8(7):e69072. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23922681
(42) American Academy of Pediatrics Commitee on Fetus and Newborn; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. The Apgar Score. Pediatrics [serial on the Internet]. 2017[access: 2017 Nov 7];136(4):819-24. Available from: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/117/4/1444.short
(43) Silva CA, Costa RC, Gonzaga IC. Asfixia Perinatal: prevalência e fatores de risco em recém-nascidos a termo. R. Interd [periódico na internet]. 2014 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017];7(1): 134-40. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbgo/v26n10/22907.pdf
(44) Takazono PS, Golin MO. Asfixia Perinatal: repercussões neurológicas e Detecção Precoce. Rev Neurocienc [periódico na internet]. 2013[acesso: 7 nov. 2017];21(1):108-17. Disponível em: http://www.revistaneurociencias.com.br/edicoes/2013/RN2101/revisao 2101/761revisao.pdf
(45) Bustamante TF, Gonçalves TA, Ferreira G, Moraes AG. Estudo Sobre a Mortalidade em UTI Neonatal de um Hospital Escola no Sul de Minas. Rev Ciênc Saúde [periódico na internet]. 2014[acesso: 7 nov. 2017];4(2):1-11. Disponível em: http://200.216.240.50:8484/rcsfmit/ojs-2.3.3-3/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/231/200
(46) Lansky S, Friche AA, Silva AA, Campos D, Bittencourt SD, Carvalho ML et al. Pesquisa Nascer no Brasil: perfil da mortalidade neonatal e avaliação da assistência à gestante e ao recém-nascido. Cad Saúde Pública [periódico na internet]. 2014 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017];30(Sup):S192-S207. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csp/v30s1/0102-311X-csp-30-s1-0192.pdf
(47) Rüdiger M, Braun, N, Aranda J, Aguar M, Bergert R, Bystricka A et al. Neonatal assessment in the delivery room-Trial to Evaluate a Specified Type of Apgar (TEST-Apgar). BMC Pediatrics [serial on the Internet]. 2015 [access: 2017 Nov 7];8(1):15-8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884954
(48) Dalili H, Nili F, Sheikh M, Hardani AK, Shariat M, Nayeri F. Comparison of the Four Proposed Apgar Scoring Systems in the Assessment of Birth Asphyxia and Adverse Early Neurologic Outcomes. PLOS One [serial on the Internet]. 2015 [access: 2017 Nov 7];10(3):e0122116. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374718/pdf/pone.0122116.pdf
(49) Schardosim JM, Rushel LM, Motta GC, Cunha ML. Adaptação transcultural e validação clínica da Neonatal Skin Condition Score para o português do Brasil. Rev. Latino-Am Enfermagem [periódico na internet]. 2014 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017];22(5):834-
Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v22n5/pt_0104-1169-rlae-22-05-00834.pdf
(50) Motta GC, Schardosim JM, Cunha ML. Neonatal Infant Pain Scale: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation in Brazil. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management [serial on the Internet]. 2015 [access: 2017 Nov 7];50(3):394-401. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26025270
(51) Bueno M, Costa P, Oliveira AA, Cardoso R, Kimura AF. Tradução e Adaptação do Premature Infant Pain Profile para a Língua Portuguesa. Texto Contexto Enferm [periódico na internet]. 2013 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017];22(1):29-35. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v22n1/pt_04.pdf
(52) Silva AA, Leite AJ, Lamy ZC, Moreira ME, Gurgel RC, Cunha AJ et al. Morbidade neonatal e near miss na pesquisa Nascer no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública [periódico na internet]. 2014 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017];30(Suplemento):S182-91. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csp/v30s1/0102-311X-csp-30-s1-0182.pdf
(53) Silva GA, Rosa KA, Saguier ES, Henning E, Mucha F, Frano SC. Estudo de base populacional sobre a prevalência de near miss neonatal em município do sul do Brasil: prevalência e fatores associados. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant [periódico na internet]. 2017 [acesso: 7 nov. 2017];17(1):169-77. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbsmi/v17n1/pt_1519-3829-rbsmi-17-01-0159.pdf
(54) Lima JC, Mingarelli AM Segri NJ, Zavala AA, Takano AA. Estudo de base populacional sobre mortalidade infantil. Ciências & Saúde Coletiva [periódico na internet]. 2017[acesso: 7 nov. 2017];23(3):931-9. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v22n3/1413-8123-csc-22-03-0931.pdf
(55) Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS). Cartilha nova organização do cuidado ao parto e nascimento para melhores resultados de saúde: Projeto Parto Adequado — fase 1/Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar, Sociedade Beneficente Israelita Hospital Albert Einstein, Institute for Healthcare Improvement — Rio de Janeiro: ANS; 2016 [acesso: 5 nov. 2017]. Disponível em: http://www.ans.gov.br/images/stories/Materiais_para_pesquisa/Materiais_por_assunto/web_total_parto_adequado.pdf
(56) Boyle EM, Johnson S, Manktelow B, Seaton SE, Draper ES, Smith LK et al. Neonatal outcomes and delivery of care for infants born late preterm or moderately preterm: a prospective population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed [serial on the Internet]. 2015 [access: 2017 Nov 7];100(6):F479-85. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834169
(57) Cantarutti A, Franchi M, Compagnoni MM, Merlino L, Corrao G. Mother’s education and the risk of several neonatal outcomes: an evidence from an Italian population-based study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth [serial on the Internet]. 2017[access: 2017 Nov 7];17(221):1-10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles /PMC5508478/
(58) Graner S, Svensson T, Beau AB, Damase-Michel C, Engeland A, Furu K et al. Neuraminidase inhibitors during pregnancy and risk of adverse neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations: population based European register study. BMJ [serial on the Internet]. 2017 [access: 2017 Nov 7];356(j629):1-8. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content /bmj/356/bmj.j629.full.pdf
(59) Zenzmaimer C, Leitner H, Brezinka C, Oberaigner W, König-Bachmann M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor: a population-based study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics [serial on the Internet]. 2017 [access: 2017 Nov 7];295(5):1175-83. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28357560
(60) Bovjerb ML, Cheyney M, Everson C. Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Following Waterbirth: the midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project 2004 to 2009 Cohort. American College of Nurse Midwives [serial on the Internet]. 2016 [access: 2017 Nov 7];61(1)11-20. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26789485
- Resumen visto - 1126 veces
- PDF (Português) descargado - 26 veces
