¿Es efectiva una intervención psicológica de enfermería sobre la calidad de vida y la función cognitiva en pacientes con carcinoma gástrico?
Resumen
Bibliografía
1. Zhang, X, Yang, L, Hou, L, Liu, J, Zhu, H, Zhang, J. Effect of a psychological nursing intervention on quality of life and cogni-tive function in patients with gastric carcinoma: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care. 2020; 00:e13292. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13292 [acceso: 03/08/2020]
2. Cabello JB. por CASPe. Plantilla para ayudarte a entender un Ensayo Clínico. En: CASPe. Guías CASPe de Lectura Crítica de la Literatura Médica. Alicante: CASPe; 2005. Cuaderno I. p.5-8.
3. López Alonso SR, De Pedro Gómez J, Marqués Andrés S. Comentario crítico de un estudio científico para una publicación . Index de Enfermería [Index Enferm] 2009; 18(1). Disponible en: http://www.index-f.com/index- enfermeria/v18n1/6990.php [acceso: 21/08/2020]
4. Baoyindeligeer, Zhang L. Rehabilitation and quality of life improvement of patients with esophageal carcinoma surgery by psychological intervention. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2020;13(2):1299-306.
5. Zhang X, Liu J, Zhu H, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Zhang J. Effect of Psychological Intervention on Quality of Life and Psychological Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Psychiatry-Interpers Biol Process. 2020;83(1):58-69.
6. Li P, Guo Y-J, Tang Q, Yang L. Effectiveness of nursing intervention for increasing hope in patients with cancer: a metaanalysis 1. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem . 9 de agosto de 2018;26. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC 6091366/ [acceso: 13/09/2020]
7. Chang Z, Guo A, Zhou A, Sun T-W, Ma L, Gardiner FW, et al. Nurse-led psychological intervention reduces anxiety symptoms and improves quality of life following percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease. Aust J Rural Health. abril de 2020;28(2):124-31.
8. Harand C, Defer G. Psychological interventions in multiple sclerosis: Improving cognition and quality of life. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. marzo de 2020;63(2):148-53.
9. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the qualityof reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17:1-12.
10. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Oxman A editores. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. Ontario: McMaster University and Evidence Prime Inc; 2013. Disponible en: http://gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html [acceso: 29/08/2020]
- Resumen visto - 1475 veces
- PDF descargado - 58 veces