Validación de instrumento con indicadores para software de dimensionamiento del enfermero en la atención obstétrica hospitalaria

Validation of instrument with indicators for nurse dimensioning software in hospital obstetric care

  • Inácio Alberto Pereira Costa Programa de Posgrado en Enfermería, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (PEN/UFSC). Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil
  • Zannis Benevides de Andrade Programa de Posgrado en Enfermería, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (PEN/UFSC). Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil
  • Maria de Lourdes de Souza Programa de Posgrado en Enfermería, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (PEN/UFSC). Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil
Palabras clave: Reducción de Personal, Enfermeras Obstétricas, Estudios de Validación, Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud, Invenciones
Key-words: Personnel Downsizing, Nurse Midwives, Validation Studies, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Inventions

Resumen

Abstract

Bibliografía

1. Chaves RRG, Morais e Silva CF, Motta E, Ribeiro EDLM, Andrade YNL. Systematiza-tion of Nursing Care: Overview of Nurses. Rev. Enferm. UFPE. 2016; 10 (4): 1280-1285. Doi: 10.5205/reuol.8464-74011-1-SM.1004201615.
2. Reis TR, Zamberlan C, Quadros JS, Gra-sel JT, Moro ASS. Obstetric Nurses: contri-butions to the objectives of the Millennium Development Goals. Rev. Gaúcha Enferm. 2015; 36(spe): 94-101. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/1983- 1447.2015.esp.57393.
3. Aguiar JC, Versiani JCC, Dias CLO, Moreira DC, Andrade DCS, Xavier GC. Care Indicators for Delivery Routes. Rev. Enferm. UFPE. 2018; 2(6): 1674-1680. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v12i6a230 890p1674-1680-2018.
4. Fugulin FMT, Lima AFC, Castilho V, Guimarães CP, Carvalho A, Gaidzinski RR. Nursing staff in the internal medicine and surgical units of teaching hospitals: compo-sition and cost. Rev. esc. enferm. USP. 2015; 49(spe2): 48-54. Doi: 10.1590/S0080-6234 20150000800007.
5. Santos FAPS, Enders BC, Brito RS, Farias PHS, Teixeira GA, Dantas DNA, et al. Au-tonomy for obstetric nurse on low-risk childbirth care. Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant. 2019; 19(2): 471-479. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-93042019000200012.
6. Barbosa HB, Paiano LAG, Nicola AL, Fernandes LM. Complexity level of patient assessment and the amount of professional nursing. Rev. Enferm. UFSM. 2014; 4(1): 29-37. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/21797692 9230.
7. Vituri DW, Évora YDM. Total Quality Management and hospital nursing: an inte-grative literature review. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2015 Oct; 68(5): 945-952. Doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/0034-7167.2015680525i.
8. Rossaneis MA, Gabriel CS, Haddad MCL, Melo MRAC, Bernardes A. Health care quality indicators: the opinion of nursing managers of teaching hospitals. Cogitare Enferm. 2015; 20(4): 798-804. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.53 80/ce.v20i4.41734.
9. Lima ES, Cabral BTV, Gondim HMF, Oliveira DA. Validation instrument for assessment of satisfaction level of care in nursing pre-delivery. Enferm. Brasil. 2019; 18(3): 349-358. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33233/eb. v18i3.2164.
10. Vituri DW, Matsuda LM. Content vali-dation of quality indicators for nursing care evaluation. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2009; 43(2): 429-437. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/S0080-62342009000200024.
11. Melo RP, Moreira RP, Fontenele FC, Aguiar ASC, Joventino ES, Carvalho EC. Criteria for Selection of Experts for Valida-tion Studies of Nursing Phenomena. Rev. Rene. 2011; 12(2): 424-431. Disponible en: http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/425 4/3285 [acceso: 12/07/2019].
12. Bittencourt H R, Creutzberg M, Rodri-gues ACM, Casartelli AO, Freitas ALS. Desenvolvimento e validação de um instru-mento para avaliação de disciplinas na educação superior. Est. Aval. Educ. 2011; 22(48): 91-114. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18222/eae2 24820111994.
13. Medina MG, Silva GAP, Aquino R, Hartz ZMA. Uso de modelos teóricos na avaliação em saúde: aspectos conceituais e operacionais. En: Hartz ZMA, Silva LMV. Orgs. Avaliação em saúde: dos modelos teóricos à prática na avaliação de programas e sistemas de saúde. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2005; 41-63. Doi: 10.7476/9788575415160.
14. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Saúde Complementar (ANS). E-EFI-06: Média de Permanência Maternidade. En: QUALISS - Indicadores Hospitalares Essenciais - 2013/14: Domínio: Eficiência. Rio de Janei-ro: ANS, v. 01, [4f], 2013. Disponible en: http://www.ans.gov.br/images/stories/presta dores/E-EFI-06.pdf [acceso: 15/09/2019].
15. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Medidas de Prevenção e Critérios Diagnósticos de Infecções Puer-perais em Parto Vaginal e Cirurgia Cesaria-na/Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Brasília: Anvisa, 2017. Disponible en: https://repositorio.observatoriodocuidado.org/ bitstre-am/handle/handle/1614/Medidas_de_ Pre-vencao_Criterios_Diagnosticos_de_Infec co-es_Puerperais.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed =y [acceso: 16/09/2019].
16 Associação Paulista de Medicina (APM). Conselho Regional de Medicina do Estado de São Paulo (CREMESP). Programa CQH: Compromisso com a Qualidade Hospitalar. São Paulo: Programa CQH, 2009. (3º Caderno de Indicadores). Disponible en: http://www.cqh.org.br/portal/pag/anexos/bai xar.php?p_ndoc=127&p_nanexo=5 [acceso: 14/10/2019].
17. World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer pain relief: with a guide of opiod availabilit. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996 (2ª ed). Disponible en: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/924154 4821.pdf [acceso: 17/09/2019].
18. Zucchi P, Bittar OJNV, Haddad N. Productivity in teaching hospitals in the state of São Paulo, Brasil. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica. 1998; 4(5): 311-316. Disponible en: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/1998.v4n5/311-316/pt [acceso: 15/09/2019].
19. Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 1955; 101(2): 343-352. Disponible en: http://www2.psych.utoronto.ca/users/peterson /psy430s2001/Miller%20GA%20Magical%20Seven%20Psych%20Review%201955.pdf [acceso: 21/09/2019].
20. Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res. Nursing. Health. 1997; 20(3):269-274. Doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3 269::AID-NUR9 3.0.CO;2-G.
21. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recomendationas. Res. Nurs. Health. 2006; 29(5): 489-497. Doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
22. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16(3): 297-334. Doi:10.1007/ BF02310 555.
23. Pierotti I, Fonseca LF, Nascimento LA, Rossetto EG, Furuya RK. Elaboration, validation and reliability of the safety protocol for pediatric thirst management. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3321. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3 333.3321.
24. Costa TF, Pimenta CJL, Nóbrega MML, Fernandes MGM, Nogueira JA, Costa KNFM. Validation of Bakas Caregiving Outcome scale for brazilian portuguese. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020; 28:e3249. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.319 1.3249.
25. Montejano-Lozoya R, Gea-Caballero V, Miguel-Montoya I, Juárez-Vela R, Sanjuán-Quiles A, Ferrer-Ferrandiz E. Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2019; 27:e3206. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/15 18-8345.3102.3206.
26. D'Espíndula TS, França BHS. Ethical and bioethical aspects in the research inter-view: the impact on subjectivity. Rev. Bioét. 2016; 24(3): 495-502. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15 90/1983-80422016243149.
27. Mula JM, Auz JV, Navarro PM, Cabas-cango KC, Cabascango CC. Gestión de la calidad de los cuidados de enfermería hos-pitalaria basada en la evidencia científica. Index de Enfermería 2016; 25(3): 151-155. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php? script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-1296201600 0200006&lng=es [acceso: 22/08/20].
28. Oliveira ARS, Araujo TL, Carvalho EC, Costa AGS, Cavalcante TF, Lopes MVO. Construction and validation of indicators and respective definitions for the nursing outcome Swallowing Status. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2015; 23(3): 450-457. Doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0377.2575.
29. Yamada BFA, Santos VLCG. Development and validation of Ferrans & Powers Quality of Life Index - wound version. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2009; 43(spe): 1105-1113. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/S0080-62342009000500015.
30. Nogueira VO, Cunha ICKO. Validation of competency prole content of nurse managers of higher education. Rev. Cuid. 2018; 9(1): 1998-2006. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/ cuidarte.v9i1.474.
31. Neves T, Rodrigues V, Graveto J, Parreira P. Scale of adverse events associated to nursing practices: a psychometric study in Portuguese hospital context. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2018; 26:e3093. Doi: http://dx. doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2595.3093.
32. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee S, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research, Social Work Research. 2003; 27(2): 94–104. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ swr/27.2.94.

Novedades
Estadísticas
Cómo citar
1.
Alberto Pereira Costa, Inácio; Benevides de Andrade, Zannis; de Lourdes de Souza, Maria. Validación de instrumento con indicadores para software de dimensionamiento del enfermero en la atención obstétrica hospitalaria. Index de Enfermería. 2021; 30(1-2): e12821. Disponible en: http://ciberindex.com/c/ie/e12821 [acceso: 17/09/2021]
Comentarios

DEJA TU COMENTARIO     VER 0 COMENTARIOS

Normas y uso de comentarios


Hay un total de 0 comentarios


INTRODUCIR NUEVO COMENTARIO

Para enviar un comentario, rellene los campos situados debajo. Recuerde que es obligatorio indicar un nombre y un email para enviar su comentario (el email no sera visible en el comentario).

Nombre:
e-mail:
Comentario: