Actitud ante el diagnóstico enfermero de profesionales de enfermería del Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa

Carlos Navas-Ferrer; María de los Ángeles Rodríguez-Pérez; Alba Molina-Fajo

Carlos Navas-Ferrer Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Zaragoza (Zaragoza, España)
María de los Ángeles Rodríguez-Pérez Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Zaragoza (Zaragoza, España)
Alba Molina-Fajo Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Zaragoza (Zaragoza, España)

Palabras clave: Diagnóstico de enfermería, Actitud de profesionales sanitarios, Práctica profesional

Key-words: Nursing diagnosis, Attitude of health personnel, Professional practice, Nursing process

Resumen

Objetivo principal: Analizar la asociación entre la actitud ante los diagnósticos enfermeros y el grado de contacto con estos de las enfermeras. Metodología: 116 enfermeras participaron en un estudio descriptivo cumplimentando un cuestionario de variables sociodemográficas, laborales, formativas y de grado de contacto con el diagnóstico de enfermería y la escala Position on Nursing Diagnosis-Spanish Version que mide la actitud ante el diagnóstico enfermero. Se realizó un análisis estadístico descriptivo y otro inferencial con SPSS 23.0. Resultados principales: La actitud ante los diagnósticos enfermeros correlacionó con el grado de contacto. No se hallaron diferencias significativas en función de las variables sexo, lugar de trabajo y formación. Conclusión principal: La actitud ante el diagnóstico enfermero de las enfermeras es neutra y el grado de contacto con ellos escaso, presentando una actitud más positiva las enfermeras con mayor grado de contacto.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the association between the attitude towards nursing diagnosis and the level of contact of the nurses with it. Methods: 116 nurses participated in a descriptive study completed a questionnaire of sociodemographic, occupational, training and level of contact with the nursing diagnosis variables and the Position in Nursing Diagnosis-Spanish Version (PND-SV) scale which measures the attitude towards the nursing diagnosis. A descriptive and inferential analysis was performed with SPSS 23.0. Results: The attitude towards nursing diagnosis correlated with the level of contact with them. There were no significant differences as a function of the variables gender, place of work and postgraduate training. Conclusions: Nurses’ attitude towards nursing diagnosis is neutral and the level of contact with them is scarce, presenting a more positive attitude from professionals with a greater level of contact.

Bibliografía

1. Alfaro-Lefevre, Rosalinda. Aplicación del proceso enfermero: guía paso a paso. Barcelona: Springer-Verlag Ibérica D.L, 1998 (4 ed.).
2. Gallagher Lepak, Susan. Fundamentos de los diagnósticos enfermeros. En: Herdman, T Heather; Kamitsuru, Shigemi, editoras. NANDA-Internacional Diagnósticos enfermeros: Definiciones y clasificación 2015-2017. Barcelona: Elsevier, 2015; 21–30.
3. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification 1999-2000. Philadelphia: NANDA, 1999.
4. Fernández Ferrín, Carmen; Luis Rodrigo, María Teresa. Proceso enfermero. En: Luis Rodrigo, María Teresa, editora. De la teoría a la práctica: el pensamiento de Virginia Henderson en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Elsevier, 2007; 3–16.
5. Cárdenas-Valladolid, Juan; Salinero-Fort, Miguel A; Gómez-Campelo, Paloma; De Burgos-Lunar, Carmen; et al. Effectiveness of Standardized Nursing Care Plans in Health Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Two-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study. PLoS One 2012;7(8):e43870.
6. Azzolin, Karina; Mussi, Clauda Motta; Ruschel, Karen Brasil; De Souza, Emiliane Nogueira; De Fátima Lucena, Amália; Rabelo-Silva, Eneida Rejane. Effectiveness of nursing interventions in heart failure patients in home care using NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC. Appl Nurs Res 2013;26(4):239–244.
7. Müller-Staub, Maria; Lavin, Mary Ann; Needham, Ian; Van Achterberg, Theo. Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes - application and impact on nursing practice: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006;56(5):514–531.
8. Törnvall, Eva; Jansson, Inger. Preliminary Evidence for the Usefulness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies in Different Fields of Application: A Literature Review. Int J Nurs Knowl 2017;28(2):109–119.
9. Welton, John M; Halloran, Edward J. Nursing diagnoses, diagnosis-related group, and hospital outcomes. J Nurs Adm 2005;35(12):541–549.
10. Luis Rodrigo, María Teresa. Los diagnósticos enfermeros: revisión crítica y guía práctica. Barcelona: Elsevier, 2013 (9 ed.).
11. Axelsson, Lena; Bjorvell, Catrin; Mattiasson Anne Cathrine; Randers, Ingrid. Swedish Registered Nurses’ incentives to use nursing diagnoses in clinical practice. J Clin Nurs 2006;15(8):936–945.
12. Paganin, Angelita; Moraes, María Antonienta; Pokorski, Simoni; Rabelo, Eneida Rejane. Factors That Inhibit the Use of Nursing Language. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2008;19(4):150–157.
13. Whitley, Gregoria Griffith; Gulanick, Meg. Barriers to the use of nursing diagnosis language in clinical settings. Nurs Diagn 1996;7(1):25–32.
14. Da Cruz, Dina de Almeida Lopes Monteiro; Hayashi, Alda Aparecida Mastelaro; Oliva, Ana Paula Vilcinski; Corrêa, Consuelo Garcia. Adaptation and validation of the “Positions on Nursing Diagnosis” tool to Portuguese language. Rev Bras Enferm 2006;59(2):163–167.
15. Lunney, Margaret; Krenz, Maryanne. An instrument to measure attitudes toward nursing diagnosis. En: Carroll-Johnson, Rose Mary; Paquette, Mary, editoras. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. San Diego: Lippincott, 1992; 389–390.
16. Paans, Wolter; Nieweg, Roos MB, Van der Schans, Cees P, Sermeus, Walter. What factors influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnoses documentation in clinical practice? A systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs 2011;20(17–18):2386–2403.
17. Ajzen, Icek; Fishbein, Martin. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
18. Ajzen, Icek. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50(2):179–211.
19. Fishbein, Martin; Ajzen, Icek. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
20. Fishbein, Martin; Ajzen, Icek. Attribution of responsibility: A theoretical note. J Exp Soc Psychol 1973;9(2):148–153.
21. Romero-Sánchez, José Manuel; Paloma-Castro, Olga; Dueñas-Rodríguez, María; Paramio-Cuevas, Juan Carlos; et al. The relationship between characteristics of nurses and their attitude towards nursing diagnosis: a cluster analysis. J Clin Nurs 2014;23(17–18):2681–2684.
22. Romero-Sánchez, José Manuel; Paloma-Castro, Olga. Is attitude toward nursing diagnosis a determinant of its use? Int J Nurs Knowl 2014;25(2):71–72.
23. Oliva, Ana Paula Vilcinski; Da Cruz, Dina de Almeida Lopes Monteiro; Volpato, Márcia Paschoalina; Hayashi, Alda Aparecida Mastelaro. Atitudes de alunos e enfermeiros frente ao diagnóstico de enfermagem: attitudes of nurses and nursing students. Acta Paul Enferm 2005;18(4):361–367.
24. Abed El-Rahman, Mona; Al Kalaldeh, Mahmoud T; Malak, Malakeh Z. Perceptions and Attitudes Toward NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses: A Cross-Sectional Study of Jordanian Nursing Students. Int J Nurs Knowl 2017;28(1):13-18.
25. Collins, Anita. Effect of Continuing Nursing Education on Nurses’ Attitude Toward and Accuracy of Nursing Diagnosis. Int J Nurs Knowl 2013;24(3):122–128.
26. Hasegawa, Tomoko; Ogasawara, Chie; Katz, Edmont C. Measuring Diagnostic Competency and the Analysis of Factors Influencing Competency Using Written Case Studies. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2007;18(3):93–102.
27. De Souza Guedes, Erika; Turrini, Ruth Natalia Teresa; Cardoso de Sousa, Regina Marcia; Troncoso Baltar, Valeria; Da Cruz, Dina de Almeida Lopes Monteiro. Atitudes dos profissionais de enfermagem relacionadas ao Processo de Enfermagem. Rev da Esc Enferm da USP 2012;46(Especial):130–137.
28. D’Agostino, Fabio; Vellone, Ercole; Cerro, Erminio; Di Sarra, Luca; et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Positions on Nursing Diagnosis scale. Appl Nurs Res 2016;29:e1-6.
29. Romero-Sánchez, José Manuel; Paramio-Cuevas, Juan Carlos; Paloma-Castro, Olga; Pastor-Montero, Sonia María; et al. The Spanish version of the Position on Nursing Diagnosis scale: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment. J Adv Nurs 2013;69(12):2759–2771.
30. De Souza Guedes, Erika; Cardoso de Sousa, Regina Marcia; Turrini, Ruth Natalia Teresa; Troncoso Baltar, Valeria; Da Cruz, Dina de Almeida Lopes Monteiro. Adaptation and validation of the instrument positions on the nursing process. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2013;21(1):404–411.
31. Higuchi, Kathryn A; Dulberg, Corinne; Duff, Viola. Factors associated with nursing diagnosis utilization in Canada. Nurs Diagn 1999;10(4):137–147.
32. De Marchis, Giorgio P. La validez externa de las encuestas en la web. Amenazas y su control. Estudio sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 2012;18(Especial):263–272.

Actitud ante el diagnóstico enfermero de profesionales de enfermería del Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa

Nurses' attitude towards nursing diagnosis at Lozano Blesa Hospital

Resumen

Abstract

Bibliografía