Revisiones Sistemáticas Exploratorias como metodología para la síntesis del conocimiento científico

Scoping Reviews as a methodology for scientific knowledge synthesis

Revisões Exploratórias Sistemáticas como metodologia para a síntese do conhecimento científico

  • H Fernández-Sánchez University of Alberta. Faculty of Nursing. Edmonton Clinic Health Academy (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)
  • K King University of Alberta. Faculty of Nursing. Edmonton Clinic Health Academy (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)
  • C.B Enríquez-Hernández Universidad Veracruzana. Facultad de Enfermería (Puerto de Veracruz, Veracruz, México)
Palabras clave: Método, revisión sistemática, revisión sistemática exploratoria, Canadá
Key-words: Method, scoping review, systematic review, Canada
Palavras chave: Método, revisão sistemática, revisão sistemática exploratória, Canada

Resumen

Abstract

Resumo

Bibliografía

1. Mazurek-Melnyk B, Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell SB, Williamson KM. The seven steps of evidencebased practice: following this progressive, sequential approach will lead to improved health care and patient outcomes. Am J Nurs. 2010; 110(1): 51-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000366056.06605.d2
2. Wachtel RE, Dexter F. Difficulties and challenges associated with literature searches in operating room management, complete with recommendations. Anesth Analg. 2013; 117(6): 1460-79. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a6d33b
3. Wallace J, Nwosu B, Clarke M. Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(5): e001220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220
4. Clarke J. What is a systematic review? Evid Based Nurs. 2011. 14(3): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebn.2011.0049
5. Higgings JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. http://bit.ly/2S2zCru
6. Schick-Makaroff K, MacDonald M, Plummer M, Burgess J, Neander W. What synthesis methodology should I use? A review and analysis of approaches to research synthesis. AIMS Public Health. 2016; 3(1): 172-215. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.172
7. Paré G, Trudel MC, Jaana M, Kitsiou S. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Inform Manage-Amster. 2015; 52(2): 183-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
8. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini-Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. En: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017. https://bit.ly/2txKdkO
9. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2): 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
10. Arksey H, O´Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005; 8(1): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
11. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5 (Article number 69): 9 screens. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
12. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7): 467-73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
13. Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22(10): 1435-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
14. Cochrane Library. About Covidence. Community.cochrane.org. United Kingdom: Cochrane comunnity; 2020. https://bit.ly/2OvQQLO
15. Salami B, Meharali S, Salami A. The health of temporary foreign workers in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2015; 106(8): 546-54. https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.106.5182.
16. O’Rourke HM, Sidani S, Chu CH, Fox M, McGilton KS, Collins J. Pilot of a tailored danceiIntervention to support function in people with cognitive impairment residing in long-term care: A brief report. Gero and Geriatric Med. 2017; 3: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721417734672
17. Jang M, Johnson CM, D’Eramo-Melkus G, Vorderstrasse AA. Participation of racial and ethnic minorities in technology-based interventions to self-manage type 2 diabetes: A scoping review. J Transcult Nurs. 2018; 29(3):292-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659617723074
18. Fernández-Sánchez H, Enríquez- Hernández CB, Sidani S, Hernández-Osorio C, Castellanos-Contreras E, Salazar-Mendoza J. Dance intervention for Mexican family caregivers of children with developmental disability: A pilot study. J Transcult Nurs. 2019; 31(1): 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619838027
19. O’Rourke HM, Collins L, Sidani S. Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review. BMC geriatr. 2018; 18(1): 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x
20. Reid JC, Unger J, McCaskell D, Childerhose L, Zorko DJ, Kho ME. Physical rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit: a scoping review of 117 studies. J intensive care. 2018; 6(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0349-x
21. McArthur C, Gibbs JC, Patel R, Papaioannou A, Neves P, Killingbeck J, et al. A scoping review of physical rehabilitation in long-term care: Interventions, outcomes, tools. Ca J Aging. 2017; 36(4):435-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S071498081700040X
22. Bussiek P-BV, De Poli C, Bevan G. A scoping review protocol to map the evidence on interventions to prevent overweight and obesity in children. BMJ Open 2018; 8(2): e019311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019311.
23. Gardner K, Kearns R, Woodland L, Silveira M, Hua M, Katz M, et al. A scoping review of the evidence on health promotion interventions for reducing waterpipe smoking: implications for practice. Front Public Health. 2018; 6: article 308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00308
24. Verbeek J, Ruotsalainen J, Laitinen J, Korkiakangas E, Lusa S, Mänttäri S, et al. Interventions to enhance recovery in healthy workers; a scoping review. Occup Med. 2019; 69(1):54-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqy141.
25. Hammond DA, Gurnani PK, Flannery AH, Smetana KS, Westrick JC, Lat I, et al. Scoping review of interventions associated with cost avoidance able to be performed in the intensive care unit and emergency department. Pharmacotherapy. 2019; 39(3):215-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2224

Novedades
Estadísticas
Cómo citar
1.
Fernández-Sánchez, H; King, K; Enríquez-Hernández, C.B. Revisiones Sistemáticas Exploratorias como metodología para la síntesis del conocimiento científico. Enfermería Universitaria. 2020; 17(1): 87-4. Disponible en: http://ciberindex.com/c/reu/087094reu [acceso: 23/01/2021]
Sección
Artículos de revisión
Comentarios

DEJA TU COMENTARIO     VER 0 COMENTARIOS

Normas y uso de comentarios


Hay un total de 0 comentarios


INTRODUCIR NUEVO COMENTARIO

Para enviar un comentario, rellene los campos situados debajo. Recuerde que es obligatorio indicar un nombre y un email para enviar su comentario (el email no sera visible en el comentario).

Nombre:
e-mail:
Comentario: