Fatores associados à ativação de pacientes em hemodiálise

Denise Rocha Raimundo Leone; Gabriela Amorim Pereira; Arison Cristian de Paula Silva; Aline Silva de Aguiar

Denise Rocha Raimundo Leone Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil)
Gabriela Amorim Pereira Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil)
Arison Cristian de Paula Silva Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil)
Aline Silva de Aguiar Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil)

Palabras clave: Automanejo, Autocuidado, Diálisis Renal, Participación del Paciente

Key-words: Self-management, Self Care, Renal Dialysis, Patient Participation

Palavras chave: Autogestão, Autocuidado, Diálise Renal, Participação do Paciente

Resumen

Objetivo: medir la activación de pacientes en hemodiálisis y determinar los factores asociados con la activación de esta población. Materiales y método: estudio exploratorio, descriptivo y transversal con 162 pacientes sometidos a hemodiálisis en el interior de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Los datos fueron recopilados entre enero y abril de 2019 mediante instrumentos para evaluación sociodemográfica, socioeconómica y ecológica y el uso de la escala de Medición de Activación del Paciente de 13 ítems. El análisis de los datos se llevó a cabo por medio de estadística descriptiva y regresión de Poisson con varianza robusta. Resultados: la medida de activación de los pacientes en hemodiálisis osciló entre 39,4 y 90,7 puntos, siendo la media de 60,85 ± 15,57 puntos y la mediana de 53,2 (IC: 58,4-63,3) puntos. El 52,5 % (n = 85) de los participantes presentaba baja activación y el 18,5 % (n = 30) de la muestra fue clasificado en el nivel 3. Tener un nivel de educación superior y no requerir de un cuidador fueron variables asociadas a una mayor prevalencia de alta activación en este tipo de pacientes. Conclusiones: aunque las variables asociadas con una alta activación no pueden ser modificadas por los profesionales de la salud, conocerlas permite inferir el perfil de pacientes en hemodiálisis que requiere intervenciones dirigidas a incrementar sus niveles de activación

Abstract

Objective: To measure the activation of hemodialysis patients and determine the factors associated with the activation of this population. Materials and method: Exploratory, descriptive and cross-sectional study with 162 hemodialysis patients residing in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Data was collected from January to April 2019, using instruments for sociodemographic, socioeconomic and clinical evaluation and the 13-item Patient Activation Measure scale. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Poisson regression with robust variance. Results: The activation measure of the studied patients ranged from 39.4 to 90.7 points, with a mean of 60.85 ± 15.57 points and a median of 53.2 (CI: 58.4-63.3). Among participants, 52.5 % (n = 85) reported low activation, while the smallest share of patients (18.5 %, n = 30) was classified within level 3. A higher level of educational attainment and not requiring a caregiver were the variables associated with a higher prevalence of high activation among these patients. Conclusions: Although the variables associated with high activation cannot be modified by health professionals, recognizing them allows us to infer the profile of hemodialysis patients in need for interventions aimed at increasing their activation levels

Resumo

Objetivo: mensurar a ativação de pacientes em hemodiálise e determinar os fatores associados à ativação dessa população. Materiais e método: estudo exploratório, de caráter descritivo e corte transversal com 162 pacientes em tratamento hemodialítico no interior de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Os dados foram coletados de janeiro a abril de 2019, com instrumentos para avaliação sociodemográfica, socioeconômica e clínica e da escala Patient Activation Measure de 13 itens. A análise de dados foi realizada por estatística descritiva e regressão de Poisson com variância robusta. Resultados: a medida de ativação dos pacientes em hemodiálise variou de 39,4 a 90,7 pontos, em que a média é 60,85 + 15,57 pontos e a mediana 53,2 (IC: 58,4-63,3) pontos. Dos participantes, 52,5 % (n = 85) apresentavam baixa ativação, sendo que o menor quantitativo de pessoas (18,5 %, n = 30) se encontrava no nível 3. Foi associado à maior prevalência de alta ativação o fato de apresentar o nível superior de ensino e não necessitar de cuidador. Conclusões: embora as variáveis associadas à alta ativação não sejam modificadas pelos profissionais de saúde, conhecê-las permite inferir qual o perfil de pacientes em hemodiálise que necessitam de intervenções direcionadas ao aumento dos níveis de ativação

Bibliografía

(1) Bikbov B; Perico N; Remuzzi G. Disparities in chronic kidney disease prevalence among males and females in 195 countries: Analysis of the global burden of disease 2016 study. Nephron. 2018;139(4):313-318. http://doi.org/10.1159/000489897
(2) Francis ER; Kuo CC; Bernabe-Ortiz A; Nessel L; Gilman RH; Checkley W et al. Burden of chronic kidney disease in resource-limited settings from Peru: A population-based study. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0104-7
(3) GBD 2015 DAL Ys and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DAL Ys) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE ), 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1603-1658. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31460-X
(4) Crews DC; Bello AK; Saadi G. 2019 World Kidney Day Editorial — burden, access, and disparities in kidney disease. Braz J Nephrol. 2019;41(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0224
(5) Neves PDMM; Sesso RCC; Thomé FS; Lugon JR; Nascimento MM. Brazilian Dialysis Census: analysis of data from the 2009-2018 decade. Braz J Nephrol. 2020;42(2):191-200. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2019-0234
(6) National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(5):884- 930. https://bit.ly/30WEZzA
(7) Pereira CV; Leite ICG. Health-related quality of life of patients receiving hemodialysis therapy. Acta Paul Enferm. 2019;32(3):267- 274. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201900037
(8) Almeida OAE; Santos WS; Rehem TCMSB; Medeiros M. Envolvimento da pessoa com doença renal crônica em seus cuidados: revisão integrativa. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2019;24(5):1689-1698. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018245.04332019
(9) Hibbard JH; Stockard J; Mahoney ER; Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4p1):1005- 1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x
(10) Kinney RL; Lemon SC; Person SD; Pagoto SL; Saczynski JS. The association between patient activation and medication adherence, hospitalization, and emergency room utilization in patients with chronic illnesses: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(5):545- 552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.005
(11) Greene J; Hibbard JH; Sacks R; Overton V; Parrotta CD. When patient activation levels change, health outcomes and costs change, too. Health Aff. 2015;34(3):431-437. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0452
(12) Hibbard JH; Mahoney E; Sonet E. Does patient activation level affect the cancer patient journey? Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(7):1276- 1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.019
(13) Hibbard JH; Mahoney ER; Stock R; Tusler M. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1443-1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00669.x
(14) Insignia Health. Patient Activation Measure (PAM®). 2020. https://bit.ly/3nSQW2h
(15) Kearns R; Harris-Roxas B; McDonald J; Song HJ; Dennis S; Harris M. Implementing the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) in clinical settings for patients with chronic conditions: A scoping review. Integ Health J. 2020;2(1):e000032. https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000032
(16) Van Bulck L; Claes K; Dierickx K; Hellemans A; Jamar S; Smets S et al. Patient and treatment characteristics associated with patient activation in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-0917-2
(17) Zimbudzi E; Lo C; Ranasinha S; Fulcher GR; Jan S; Kerr PG et al. Factors associated with patient activation in an Australian population with comorbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017695. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017695
(18) Nair D; Cavanaugh KL. Measuring patient activation as part of kidney disease policy: Are we there yet? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(7):1435- 1443. http://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2019121331
(19) Raimundo-Leone DR; de Paula-Silva AC; Silva-de Aguiar A. Ativação do paciente com diagnóstico de doença renal crônica: uma revisão integrativa. Enferm Nefrol. 2021;24(1):11-23. https://doi.org/10.37551/s2254-28842021002
(20) Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de classificação econômica Brasil. 2018. https://www.abep.org/criterioBr/01_cceb_2018.pdf
(21) Insignia Health. What the patient activation measure® reveals. TM Licence Materials. Insignia Health; 2017.
(22) Cunha CM; da Cunha DCPT; Manzato RO; Nepomuceno E; da Silva D; Dantas RAS. Validation of the Brazilian version of the patient activation measure 13. J Nurs Meas. 2019;27(1):97-113. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.27.1.97
(23) Hibbard JH; Mahoney ER; Stockard J; Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6p1):1918-1930. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x
(24) Nelson RG; Pankratz VS; Ghahate DM; Bobelu J; Faber T; Shah VO. Home-based kidney care, patient activation, and risk factors for CKD progression in Zuni Indians: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(12):1801-1809. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.06910618
(25) República Federativa do Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Estabelece diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos, Resolução n.º 466. Brasília; 12 de dezembro de 2012. https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf
(26) Silva APR; Strogoff-de-Matos JP; Lugon JR. Metabolic acidosis in hemodialysis: A neglected problem in Brazil. Braz J Nephrol. 2020;42(3):323-329. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2019-0210
(27) Carvalho L; Cesarino CB; Garcia LF; Ribeiro RH; Orlandi FS; Kusumota L. Effects of disease and hemodialysis adequacy in patients with arterial stiffness. Esc Anna Nery. 2020;24(2):e20190068. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2019-0068
(28) D’Onofrio G; Simeoni M; Rizza P; Caroleo M; Capria M; Mazzitello G et al. Quality of life, clinical outcome, personality and coping in chronic hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2017;39(1):45-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2016.1244077
(29) van Maarschalkerweerd P; Rademakers J; Rijken M. Cancer survivors’ activation to self-management and its relationship with participation in paid work and work-related problems. Psycho-Oncology. 2017;26(11):1881-1887. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4400
(30) Bos-Touwen I; Schuurmans M; Monninkhof EM; Korpershoek Y; Spruit-Bentvelzen L; Ertugrul-van der Graaf I et al. Patient and disease characteristics associated with activation for self-management in patients with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure and chronic renal disease: A cross-sectional survey study. PloS ONE . 2015;10(5):e0126400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126400
(31) Lo C; Zimbudzi E; Teede HJ; Kerr PG; Ranasinha S; Cass A et al. Patient-reported barriers and outcomes associated with poor glycaemic and blood pressure control in co-morbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease. J Diabetes Complicat. 2019;33(1):63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.09.020
(32) Johnson ML; Zimmerman L; Welch JL; Hertzog M; Pozehl B; Plumb T. Patient activation with knowledge, self-management and confidence in chronic kidney disease. J Ren Care. 2016;42(1):15-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12142
(33) Cameron J; Worrall-Carter L; Riegel B; Lo SK; Stewart S. Testing a model of patient characteristics, psychologic status, and cognitive function as predictors of self-care in persons with chronic heart failure. Heart Lung. 2009;38(5):410-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.11.004
(34) Bahrom NH; Ramli AS; Isa MR; Abdul-Hamid H; Badlishah-Sham SF; Baharudin N et al. Factors associated with high patient activation level among individuals with metabolic syndrome at a primary care teaching clinic. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132720931301
(35) The Renal Association. Transforming participation in chronic kidney disease. Bristol; 2019. https://bit.ly/3l8QqeC
(36) McCabe PJ; Stuart-Mullen LG; McLeod CJ; Byrne TO; Schmidt MM; Branda ME et al. Patient activation for self-management is associated with health status in patients with atrial fibrillation. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1907-1916. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S172970
(37) Yadav UN; Lloyd J; Hosseinzadeh H; Baral KP; Bhatta N; Harris MF. Levels and determinants of health literacy and patient activation among multi-morbid COPD people in rural Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional study. PloS ONE . 2020;15(5): e0233488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233488
(38) Gleason KT; Tanner EK; Boyd CM; Saczynski JS; Szanton SL. Factors associated with patient activation in an older adult population with functional difficulties. Paciente Educ Couns. 2016;99(8):1421-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.011

Fatores associados à ativação de pacientes em hemodiálise

Factors associated with the activation of hemodialysis patients

Factores asociados a la activación de pacientes en hemodiálisis

Resumen

Abstract

Resumo

Bibliografía