Máquina de perfusión renal en el donante subóptimo: una mirada hacia el futuro

Renal perfusion machine in the suboptimal donor: a look into the future

  • Estefanía Iglesias González Departamento Extracción Multiorgánica y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, España)
  • Joan Torras Ambros Departamento de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, España)
Palabras clave: Preservación, Máquina de perfusión hipotérmica, Trasplante renal
Key-words: Preservation, Hypothermic perfusion machine, Kidney transplant

Resumen

Abstract

Bibliografía

1. Rao PS, Merion RM, Ashby VB, et al. Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2007;83(8):1069-74.
2. García-García G, Harden P, Chapman J, et al. The global role of kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2012;32(1):1-6.
3. Treckmann J, Moers C, Smits JM, et al. Machine perfusion versus cold storage for preservation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors after brain death. Transpl Int 2011;24:548.
4. Moers C, Kornmann NSS, Leuvenink HGD, et al. The influence of deceased donor age and old-for-old allocation on kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation 2009;88(4):542-52.
5. Saidi RF, Elias N, Kawai T, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation using expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death. Am J Transplant 2007;7:2769-74.
6. Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003;3(4):114-25.
7. Wight J.P., ChilCott J.b., holMeS M.W. et al.: Pulsatile ma- chine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review. Clin Transplant, 2003; 17:293-307.
8. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting trans-plantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999;341(23):1725-30.
9. Audard V, Matignon M, Dahan K, et al. Renal transplantation from extended criteria cadaveric donors: problems and perspectives overview. Transpl Int 2008;21:11-17.
10. Wynn JJ, Alexander CE. Increasing organ donation and transplantation: the U.S. experience over the past decade. Transpl Int 2011;24:324-32.
11. Valeri M, Torlone N, Meçule A, et al. Five years experience in a senior kidney donor programme. Cells Tissues Organs 2006;2:99-102.
12. Ojo A, Hanson J, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001;12:589-97.
13. Escalante JL, Río F. Preservación de órganos. Medicina intensiva 2009;33(6):282-92.
14. Belzer F, Ashby B, Dunphy J. 24 hour and 72-hour preservation of canine kidneys. Lancet 1967;2:536-8.
15. Matsuno N, Konno O, Mejit A, Jyojima Y, Akashi I, Nakamura Y, et al. Application of machine perfusión preservation as a viabi- lity test for marginal kidney graft. Transplantation. 2006;82: 1425-8.
16. Van Kreel BK, Janssen MA, Koostra G. Functional relationship of alpha-glutatione-S-transferasa and glutathione-S-transferasa activity in machine-preserved non-heart-beating-donor kid- neys. Transpl Int. 2002;15:546-9.
17. Hasman D, Treska V, Kuntscher V, Hes O, Trefil V, Reischig T, et al. Multiple monitoring of non-heart-beating donor kidneys du- ring pulsatile perfusion. Organs and Tissues. 2004;1:11-4.
18. Maathuis MHJ, Leuvenink HGD, Ploeg RJ. Perspectives in organ preservation. Transplantation. 2007;83:1289-98.
19. St Peter SD, Imber CJ, Friend PJ. Liver and kidney preservation by perfusion. Lancet. 2002;359:604-13.
20. Booster MH, Wijnen RMH, Yin M, Tiebosch AT, Heineman E, Maessen JG, et al. Enhanced resistance to the effect of normo- thermic isquemia in kidneys using pulsatile machine perfusion. Transplant Proc. 1993;25:3006-11.
21. Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis MHJ, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2009;360:7-19.
22. Wight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, et al. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid systematic review. Clin Transplant. 2003;17:293-307.
23. UNOS. Annual Report of US. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Transplant 2003. Disponible en: www.unos.org
24. Wszola M, Kwiatkowski A, Latek M, et al. Long term medical and economical benefit of machine perfusion storage in com-parison to cold storage. Ann Transplant 2009;14(2):24-9.
25. Groen H, Moers C, Smits JM, et al. Long Term Cost-Effectiveness of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage in Kidney Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2012;12(7):1824-30.
26. Ureña A, Fernández O, Arango A, et al. Calidad de vida en trasplante renal. En: Libro de comunicaciones del XXI Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Enfermería Nefrológica. Barcelona: HOSPAL, 1996.
27. Schaeffner ES, Rose C, Gill JS. Access to kidney transplantation among the elderly in the United Sates: A glass half full, not half empty. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:2109-14.

Novedades
Estadísticas
Cómo citar
1.
Iglesias González, Estefanía; Torras Ambros, Joan. Máquina de perfusión renal en el donante subóptimo: una mirada hacia el futuro. Evidentia. 2019; 16. Disponible en: http://ciberindex.com/c/ev/e12288 [acceso: 16/12/2019]
Sección
Heterogénea
Comentarios

DEJA TU COMENTARIO     VER 0 COMENTARIOS

Normas y uso de comentarios


Hay un total de 0 comentarios


INTRODUCIR NUEVO COMENTARIO

Para enviar un comentario, rellene los campos situados debajo. Recuerde que es obligatorio indicar un nombre y un email para enviar su comentario (el email no sera visible en el comentario).

Nombre:
e-mail:
Comentario: